HOME                       CONTACT










Below is information with regards to the origins of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and some arguments for and against it. In recent years the SDA church has made moves to come more into line with mainstream evangelical churches and abandon or distance itself from some of its more controversial beliefs. Personally, I am hesitant to regard this more recently evolved SDA church as a cult because their core beliefs about Christ, sin and salvation seem sound to me, even if like all denominations including the one I was bought up in, it does have it's doctrinal flaws.

The older version of the SDA church however I do believe borders on the "cultish". Their belief that sinners are "annihilated" rather than go to hell is contrary to scripture and also very misleading to non-Christians, in that they may reach a false conclusion that it's ok to sin up a storm , reject Jesus Christ and then just die into oblivion, and not pay a price for their rebellion. The strict observance of Saturday as "the" worship day is to me not sustainable as a correct interpretation of scripture (Colossians 2:16). Also their over concentration on the writings of Ellen G. White is a worry. She may have been sincerely and importantly involved in the evolution of the SDA church but she should be of little reference now to SDA church members, as all that is needed for a correct understanding of the Gospel is God's word itself, the Bible.

If Seventh-day Adventist church members regard their denomination as the only genuine one, that too is a serious error. There is only one true church, made up of all those people who rely solely on the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ for their forgiveness and salvation.

One must be careful when trying to determine the orthodoxy of an entire group. The Adventists are a prime example of a denomination with some outrageous claims, but still holding to Christian truth at its core. They have historically had some biblically questionable stances on those issues such as the Sabbath, the Old Testament law, annihilation of the wicked, and investigative judgment. But to place them outside Christian orthodoxy when they teach the divinity of Jesus, the doctrine of the Trinity, salvation by grace through faith alone, and the inspiration of the Scriptures would be too much. I suppose it would be best to take each Adventist on a case by case basis.

I would encourage any Seventh-day Adventists reading this to seriously examine what they are being taught and what they believe, in conjunction with a relevant study of those beliefs using a version of  the King James Bible, and NOT the SDA's "Clear Word" devotional paraphrase of Scripture.

The "Clear Word" Bible is a paraphrase, not a translation. A paraphrase is a loose adaptation of the Biblical text designed to help clarify what the original says. The proper intention of any Biblical paraphrase should be to remain faithful to the text and to expand it--not alter it--and certainly not to contradict the original words. The Seventh-day Adventist Bible, known as the Clear Word Bible, violates the Biblical text by severely altering it in many places as it restates Scripture in line with SDA bias.

In fact, the bias is so heavy that I would not recommend the Clear Word Bible to anyone. The SDA doctrines of annihilationism, soul sleep, Jesus being Michael the Archangel, seventh-day Sabbath worship, etc., all govern how the Biblical text is to be understood instead of letting the Biblical text guide the paraphrase. The Clear Word Bible is dangerous and faulty. I recommend that you steer clear of it.

The following articles may help..... Keygar




History of Seventh-day Adventism


The Seventh-day Adventist Church (abbreviated SDA) is a denomination that grew out of the prophetic Millerite movement in the United States during the middle part of the 19th century. It considers itself a branch of Protestant Christianity, though differences in doctrine and practice have led some mainstream Christians to dispute that designation.

The name of the Seventh-day Adventist denomination indicates its two main distinctive characteristics: Sabbath observance on the seventh day (i.e., Saturday) and an expectation that the end of the world is drawing near.

Other distinguishing characteristics include adherence to the teachings of Ellen G. White (who is regarded as a prophet), and various dietary observances rooted in Jewish law.

As of 2005, the Seventh-day Adventist Church had 12 million baptized members and about 25 million total members and adherents worldwide. The Seventh-day Adventist Church is one of the world's fastest-growing organizations, primarily due to increases in Third World membership. It now operates in 203 out of 228 countries recognized by the United Nations.


The Adventist movement has its roots in the 19th-century "Millerite movement," which centered on the belief that Jesus would return on October 22, 1844. William Miller (1782-1849) was a farmer who settled in upstate New York after the war of 1812. He was originally a Deist, but after much private Bible study, Miller converted to Christianity and became a Baptist. He was convinced that the Bible contained coded information about the end of the world and the Second Coming of Jesus. In 1836, he published the book Evidences from Scripture and History of the Second Coming of Christ about the Year 1843.

The prediction of the year 1843 was based in large part on Daniel 8:14: "And he said onto me, unto 2,300 days, then shall the sanctuary be cleansed." Miller believed the "2,300 days" referred to 2,300 years and that the countdown began in 457 BC. He concluded that the "cleansing of the sanctuary" (interpreted as the Second Coming) would occur sometime between March 21, 1843 and March 21, 1844.

When these dates passed, Samuel Snow, a follower of Miller, interpreted the "tarrying time" referred to in Habakkuk 2:3 as equal to 7 months and 10 days, thus delaying the end time to October 22, 1844. When this date also passed uneventfully, many followers left the movement in what is now termed "The Great Disappointment." Miller himself gradually withdrew from the leadership of the group and died in 1849.


Miller's followers who remained in the movement called themselves Adventists, and taught that the expectation had been fulfilled in a way that had not previously been understood. Further Bible study led to the belief that Jesus in that year had entered into the Most Holy Place of the heavenly sanctuary, and began an "investigative judgment" of the world: a process through which there is an examination of the heavenly records to "determine who, through repentance of sin and faith in Christ, are entitled to the benefits of His atonement" after which time Jesus will return to earth. According to the church's teaching, the return of Christ may occur very soon, though nobody knows the exact date of that event (Matthew 24:36).

For about 20 years, the Adventist movement was a rather unorganized group of people who held to this message. Among its greatest supporters were James White, Ellen G. White and Joseph Bates. Later, a formally organized church called the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists was established in Battle Creek, Michigan, on May 21, 1863, with a membership of 3,500.

Primarily through the evangelism and inspiration of Ellen G. White, who was regarded as a prophet, the church quickly grew and established a presence beyond North America during the later part of the 1800s. In 1903, the denominational headquarters were moved from Battle Creek to Washington D.C. and the neighboring community of Takoma Park, Maryland.

In 1929, a new sect was formed by Victor Houteff, whose beliefs differed from mainline Adventist teachings. The sect was called the Davidian Seventh-day Adventists. This group further subdivided into other groups that included the Students of the Seven Seals, popularly known as the Branch Davidians. This off-shoot of the Seventh-day Adventist movement, which became widely known due to David Koresh and 1993 Waco, Texas conflagration, held very little in common with the rest of Adventism.

In 1989, the headquarters of the Seventh-day Adventist Church was moved to Silver Spring, Maryland.


Seventh-day Adventist Beliefs


Seventh-day Adventist doctrine is rooted in the Anabaptist Protestant tradition. Adventist doctrine resembles mainstream orthodox trinitarian Protestant theology, with a few exceptions such as the following.


·                  Adventism. Belief in an imminent, pre-millennial, universally visible second advent, preceded by a time of trouble when the righteous will be persecuted and a false second coming where Satan impersonates the Messiah.


·                  Ellen G. White. Teaching that the "Spirit of Prophecy," an identifying mark of the remnant church, was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White, whom Adventists recognize as the Lord's messenger. Her "writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction."(28 Fundamental Beliefs) They also make clear that the Bible is the standard by which all teachings and experience must be tested.


·                  State of the dead. Seventh-day Adventists believe that death is a sleep during which the "dead know nothing" (Ecclesiastes 9:5). This view maintains that the person has no conscious form of existence until the resurrection, either at the second coming of Jesus (in the case of the righteous) or after the millennium of Revelation 20 (in the case of the wicked). Because of this view, Seventh-day Adventists do not believe hell currently exists and believe further that the wicked will be destroyed at the end of time.

Seventh-day Adventists oppose the formulation of credal statements and prefer to view the fundamental beliefs as descriptors rather than prescriptors. However, divergence from the published position is frowned upon.


Seventh-day Adventist Practices


Seventh-day Adventists observe a 24-hour sunset-to-sunset Sabbath commencing Friday evening. Justification for this belief is garnered from the creation account in Genesis in which God rested on the seventh day, an approach later immortalised in the Ten Commandments. Seventh-day Adventists maintain that there is no biblical mandate for the change from the "true Sabbath" to Sunday observance, which is to say that Sunday-keeping is merely a "tradition of men."


Church services follow an evangelical format, with emphasis placed on the sermon. During the week prayer meetings may be conducted and children often attend Adventist schools.


Seventh-day Adventists practice adult baptism by full immersion in a similar manner to the Baptists. Infants are dedicated rather than baptized, as it is argued that baptism requires consent and moral responsibility.

Seventh-day Adventists practice communion four times a year, reflecting their Methodist roots. The communion is an open service (available to members and non-members) and includes a foot-washing ceremony (commonly referred to as the Ordinance of Humility) and consumption of the Lord's Supper.

Seventh-day Adventists do not eat pork or other unclean meat as identified in the book of Leviticus and many avoid all meat for health reasons (see next section).

Missionary outreach of the Seventh-day Adventist Church is aimed at both unbelievers and other Christian churches.


Seventh-day Adventist Health Code and Dietary Restrictions


Seventh-day Adventists present a health message that recommends vegetarianism and condones abstinence from pork, shellfish, and other foods proscribed as "unclean" in Leviticus. Alcohol and tobacco are also prohibited.

Dr. John Kellogg, founder of the Kellogg's company and a major supplier of breakfast cereals, was a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The Sanitarium Health Food Company, owned by the Seventh-day Adventist Church, is one of Australia's leading manufacturers of health and vegetarian-related products.

Seventh-day Adventists run a large number of hospitals. Their predominant school of medicine in North America is located in Loma Linda, California.


Seventh-day Adventist Ethical Views


The official Seventh-day Adventist position on abortion is that it is permissable only in exceptional circumstances that present serious moral or medical dilemmas, such as significant threats to the pregnant woman's life, serious jeopardy to her health, severe congenital defects carefully diagnosed in the fetus, and pregnancy resulting from rape or incest. While the general tone toward abortion is negative, the individual Adventist may take any position on the political spectrum. Abortions are performed in Adventist hospitals.


Seventh-day Adventists generally condemn homosexuality. The church does not perform gay marriages or holy unions, and gay men cannot be ordained. Homosexuality of a spouse is given as one of the rare acceptable reasons for divorce. The official statement on sexuality states that sexual acts outside of heterosexual marriage are forbidden. However, individual Adventists may take a much more liberal position.


Criticisms of Seventh-day Advent Beliefs and Practices


There are disputes among some conservative Christian writers over whether Seventh-day Adventism is a "cult," which in this context means a group that deviates from the views of "biblical Christianity." In the late 1950s, Walter Martin and Donald Barnhouse classified Adventists as non-cultic, although for Martin this was a reversal of his classification of Adventists early in 1955 as a cult. Many followed this advice and continue to do so today, accepting Adventism as a Christian denomination, even if it holds a few doctrines which are different from mainline Christian churches.

Others, however, have rejected this view, including, for example, John Whitcomb. Adventist insularism and warnings about mixing with non-Christians and even non-Adventists, and the importance placed on Adventist education for children add to allegations of cult-like behaviour.


Some critics argue that Seventh-day Adventists' focus on the Sabbath places a focus on works rather than grace. Critics also argue that the Adventist church, in accepting Ellen G. White as a prophet and her writings as inspired, is putting forward another source of authority in addition to the Bible. This they view as contrary to the traditional Protestant sola scriptura view of the Bible as the only inspired source of authority, and the rejection of claims of latter-day prophets.

They also criticise the Christology taught by Ellen G. White as inaccurate and heterodox. For example, White taught that "Christ took upon His sinless nature our sinful nature… Christ took human nature and bore the infirmities and degeneracy of the race. He took our nature and its deteriorating condition" (Questions on Doctrine, pp. 654–656). However, Ellen White did affirm that Christ was completely sinless and Adventists argue that Christ's taking of human nature related to sickness, disease, the feeling of hunger, etc., and not to any moral propensity to sin.

Critics also view the Adventist belief in annihilationism as unbiblical. They point to various biblical passages which contradict annihilationism, for example Luke 16:19–31, which they argue clearly indicates that the dead are presently conscious in Heaven or Hell, not in some kind of soul sleep. Compare this with the description of Lazarus as asleep given by Jesus in John 11:12–14. Also consider the view of Luke 16:19–31 from the perspective of those believing in annihilationism, which is that those verses are a parable taught by Jesus, not actual events.

Critics allege that Ellen G. White taught that belief in the doctrine of "investigative judgement" was necessary for salvation. For example, she writes in her book The Great Controversy (p. 488):

The subject of the sanctuary and the investigative judgement should be clearly understood by the people of God. All need a knowledge for themselves of the position and work of their great High Priest. Otherwise it will be impossible for them to exercise the faith which is essential at this time or to occupy the position which God designs for them to fill.

It has been noted by several other Christian groups that in recent years the Adventist leadership has de-emphasised several of the uniquely Adventist doctrines, in favour of an emphasis on the basic Christian beliefs they share with other Christians, which renders the Adventist church less problematic on the whole from the perspective of other Christians. Some groups of traditionalist Seventh-day Adventists, however, disagree with this trend and a few have left the Adventist church to form splinter groups as a result.


Seventh-day Adventist Organization and Structure


Seventh-day Adventists have three levels of ordination: deacons, elders, and pastors. In some Adventist churches only men are eligible for ordination but there are many examples of deaconesses and female elders and pastors. Male pastors are allowed to marry and have families.

Organization beyond the local church is as follows: 


The global church is called the General Conference.


The General Conference is made up of divisions.


Divisions are comprised of union conferences.


Union conferences consist of local conferences.

Local conferences include local church districts. These are generally  ministered to by   one pastor each.

Local districts can contain one to many local churches (congregations).


In the United States, these numbers tend to be smaller (2-4 churches per district, perhaps), while in most of the worldwide church, the numbers tend to be larger (5+ per district and per pastor, sometimes as many as 15 or more).


Adventist Church governance, is a mixture of episcopal and presbyterian elements. Each of these local churches has its own elected governing body and office. Almost everything is decided by either elected committees, through vote of members, or representatives from the local churches. Each organization holds a general session at certain intervals. This is usually when general decisions get voted on. The president of the General Conference, for instance, is elected at the General Conference Session every five years. The current head of the Seventh-day Adventist Church is General Conference President Jan Paulsen from Norway.


Churches are governed by a church board formed by members of that church, with the pastor of that congregation. Church property is owned by the conference corporation though, and so this differs from congregational polity. Ministers are ordained by ministers as are lay elders and lay deacons (which is presbyterian rather than congregational or episcopal).


Seventh-day Adventist Education and Institutions


Seventh-day Adventists have had a long interest in education. The Adventist church runs one of the largest education systems in the world. They operate some 5,700 pre-schools, primary and secondary schools, as well as colleges, universities, seminaries and medical schools in about 145 countries worldwide. This education system involves some 66,000 teachers and 1,257,000 students. The Adventist educational program is comprehensive encompassing "mental, physical, social, and spiritual health" with "intellectual growth and service to humanity" its goal.

The Youth Department of the Seventh-day Adventist church runs an organisation for 10-16 year old boys and girls called Pathfinders. For younger children, Adventurer, Eager Beaver, and Little Lambs clubs are available that feed into the Pathfinder program. Pathfinders is similar to the Boy Scouts of America (BSA), except that membership is open to both boys and girls.

Seventh-day Adventists have founded a number of universities and hospitals throughout the world.

The Seventh-day Adventist Church has been active for over 100 years advocating for freedom of religion. In 1893 its leaders founded the International Religious Liberty Association (IRLA). They also have been formally active in humanitarian aid for over 50 years (ADRA).






Is the Seventh-day Adventist Church a Cult?  

By Robert K. Sanders


   Definition of a cult..........


1.     A leader or group of leaders, prophet, prophetess, that claims to speak for God.

Fulfillment: Ellen G. White, the Seventh-day Adventist’s prophetess makes the claim that what she writes is not her ideas, but "that which God has opened before her in vision."

"In my books, the truth is stated, barricaded by a ‘Thus saith the Lord.’ The Holy Spirit traced these truths upon my heart and mind as indelibly as the law was traced by the finger of God upon the tables of stone." Letter 90, 1906.

"In these letters which I write, in the testimonies I bear, I am presenting to you that which the Lord has presented to me. I do not write one article in the paper expressing merely my own ideas. They are what God has opened before me in vision--the precious rays of light shining from the throne." Testimonies 5 p. 67.


2.     What they write and teach their followers, contradicts Bible.

Fulfillment:  Ellen G. White holds strict authority over its members in respect to, finances, wills, diet, dress, amusement, associations, etc. as taught in her books such as Testimonies to the Church. 


3.     Many members taking issue with the authority of the leader are excommunicated, (disfellowshipped), shunned, or not allowed to hold office in the church, etc.

Fulfillment: EGW: "When the judgment of the General Conference, which is the highest authority that God has on earth, is exercised private independence and private judgment MUST NOT be maintained, but must be surrendered." Testimonies 3 p. 492.

Look at the SDA pastors that were fired for not believing in some of Ellen G. White’s teachings. Also members who have been put out of office and disfellowshipped for not accepting Ellen G. White as a prophet or her teachings.


4.     Cult  leaders teach infallibility in their teachings or the writings of their cult leader, in this case Ellen G. White.

Fulfillment: "It is from the standpoint of the light that has come through the Spirit of Prophecy (Mrs. White’s writings) that the question will be considered, believing as we do that the Spirit of Prophecy is the only infallible interpreter of Bible principles, since it is the Christ, through this agency, giving real meaning of his own words." G.A. Irwin, General Conference President, from the tract The Mark of the Beast, p. 1.

On February 7, 1887, the General Conference passed the following resolution -- "That we re-affirm our binding confidence in the Testimonies of Sister White to the Church, as the teaching of the Spirit of God." SDA Year Book for 1914, p. 253

"Our position on the Testimonies is like the key-stone to the arch. Take that out and there is no logical stopping-place till all the special truths of the Message are gone...Nothing is surer than this, that the Message and visions (of Mrs. White) belong together, and stand or fall together." Review and Herald Supplement, August 14, 1883.


5.     The cult members believes that they are superior to others because of their unique teachings as they have knowledge of God’s will that other Christians do not have.  Because of the false teachings of their prophet or leaders, they consider themselves especially chosen by God, and look at themselves as the "Remnant Church," or "The True Church".

Fulfilled: Ellen G. White and the Seventh-day Adventist Church view themselves as "the Remnant Church" alone especially called by God in 1844, over all other churches, which they called Babylon. The Adventist still considers themselves the Remnant Church. Read, "Seventh-day Adventist Believe 27," Chapter 12, The Remnant and Its Mission, p.153.

Seventh-day Adventist Believe: "One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy, This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White." "Seventh-day Adventist Believe 27," p.216.

Without Ellen G. White and her Bible Contradictions, the Seventh-day Adventist Church could not call itself the Remnant Church.


6.     Adventist leaders and their members use the writings of Ellen G. White to interpret the Scriptures. EGW's writings are the final arbitrator of doctrines.

Fulfilled: The Adventist’s claim to hold the Bible above all teachings, but in fact they interpret the Bible by the writings of Ellen G. White. This is demonstrated in their Sabbath school Quarterlies, sermons, and articles in their church paper, "Adventist Review." Her counsel is to be followed as Scripture.


7.     They publish their own Bible and insert their own doctrines in the text.

Fulfilled: The Seventh-day Adventist Church publishes The Clear Word Bible. It is a cultic Bible that does not separate the Bible text from the author’s personal commentary, opinions, which slants the text to agree with the writings of Ellen G. White and whatever else to make the text say what he wants it to say. This corrupt piece of work, makes the Word of God unclear to the reader.

Adventist scholar Dr. Sakae Kubo say’s, "I am concerned about how our membership regard and use Blanco’s Clear Word. Behind my remarks is a history of Bibles of this sort that have a terrible bias. The Jehovah’s Witnesses’ New World Translation is an obvious example—the divinity of Christ is removed and His createdness is brought out along with other tendential characteristics. The very obvious and serious danger is that our own people will be confused as to what the Bible really says. Interpretation has been so mixed in with the text that our people will think that the interpretation is part of the Word of God." Adventist Review, April 1995, p.15.

             The Clear Word Bible, 1994 by Jack J. Blanco.
             Printed and distributed by Review and Herald Publishing Association,
             55 West Oak Ridge Drive, Hagerstown, MD 21740


8.    Religious cults look at individuals that leave their group as being lost, and without salvation.

Fulfilled: It is difficult for Seventh-day Adventists to fathom that a person leaving their church can remain a Christian and still be saved. After I left the Adventist Church I had letters telling me I was being led by Satan, I was making war on God's church, I would burn in Hell, and that I should come back to the church, etc.

Christians that do not belong to the Seventh-day Adventist Church are often called "outsiders." When a Christian from another Church joins the Seventh-day Adventist Church, they are said, "to have come into the truth."


What is a cult?

A religious cult is an organization that has departed from mainstream Christianity to follow doctrines that are not Biblical. They hold their leader's Bible contradictions over the Word of God.  The Seventh-day Adventist Church teaches many non-Biblical doctrines.

Webster’s Dictionary by Random House: cult n. 1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies. 2. a. a group that devotes itself to or venerates a person, ideal, fad, etc. 3. a. a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist. b. the members of such a religion or sect. -adj. 4. of or pertaining to a cult. 5. of, for, or attracting a small group of devotees: a cult movie. cultic, adj. cultish, adj. cultism, n. cultist, n.


Are there different kinds of cults?

Most definitely. There are religious cults, Satanic cults, secular cults.  Some cults are purely secular such as;  sport idols, UFO cults, movie stars, and some are dedicated for good of society. A cult in itself is not necessarily evil.

Christians need to be alert as to what is being taught as truth and refuse to accept Biblical Contradictions especially if a church has a prophet. People find comfort and security in belonging to religious cults, as it agrees with their beliefs that they were brain-washed into believing as truth.





Is the Seventh-day Adventist Church a Cult?


By Larry Kirkpatrick


Why the Different Opinions about What Is Truth?

The many religious bodies constituting Christendom have never agreed which teachings define heaven's authentic system of belief. The ideas that reflect a group's distinctive doctrinal perspective are many. Even the authorities that stand at the foundation of each group's beliefs differ in substantial ways. For some groups, the final basis is tradition. For some, it is the Bible. For another, modern "prophetic" teachings may provide the foundation. Some groups use the Bible or part of it. Many combinations are possible.

A number of groups base their teachings upon the same source -- the Bible -- and yet approach its interpretation from different starting points or pre-suppositional sets. Is the Bible to be taken absolutely literally? Should the passages containing miracles be discounted as myths? Would God wish that we use a "sanctified imagination" to make our understanding of the Bible fit better with more "informed," up-to-date notions? Or shall we read the Bible and seek the plain meaning of its text as it's been given? How we answer these questions will have a large impact on what we understand God to be saying.

The point is, that the varying sources of spiritual authority and the presuppositions which we bring to them make evaluating which groups are heretical (false) and which groups are orthodox (true) a meaningful task. Significant thought and evaluation are required in order to be fair. And who draws the baseline against which the other groups are to be measured? Shall it be the majority? How often, historically, has the majority been correct in religious matters? Wouldn't it be much fairer to consider how consistent a group's teachings are in relation to their declared principles? This is what we must do if we would be both serious and fair.

Ultimate truth is not itself relative. An objective, bottom-line truth does indeed exist. Even this is a presupposition. Yes, it runs against presently accepted wisdom. But that wisdom is merely the presently popular foam riding the crest of this moment's philosophical wave.

Some persons measure other groups against their own favorite list of doctrines. Some, against what is supposed to have been the most common belief-set in historical terms. Yet this is usually quite subjective, and of little use except in providing self-justification for the evaluator's own position.

We've begun our thinking about cults with these considerations before us. But now we must turn to the criteria by which we will make our evaluation. Various criteria have been reviewed by which the teachings of religious bodies have been defined as being cultic or not. Some suggest that we use primarily sociological criteria, others historical, others biblical. Much writing concerning "cults" in the past has consisted of measuring groups up against doctrinal criteria. While this may seem the rigid approach of less-enlightened times, it has the advantage of being at least somewhat less subjective than most of the other means. it has been the practice of Seventh-day Adventists to identify themselves in biblical and doctrinal terms. They thus most readily lend themselves to evaluation on a doctrinal basis.

To simplify the matter, doctrinal definitions of cults tend to define them according to these primary points:

  1. The group is founded by a single, exceptional andhighly charismatic individual.

  2. The group either unduly elevates man, or lowers God.

  3. The group adds other sources of authority equal to or of greater weighting than the Bible.

  4. The group teaches some form of salvation by works.

These will suffice as for the purposes of this paper we seek to determine whether Seventh-day Adventism is a cult.

Adventism Considered

Consider Seventh-day Adventism according to these four criteria:

Who "founded" Seventh-day Adventism? Several individuals were prominent in the early days of Adventism, including William Miller, Josiah Litch, J.V. Himes, and Charles Fitch. The initial Advent preachers came out of several denominations. They preached the soon return of Christ, which they thought to be immediately imminent. When their expectations failed to be fulfilled in the way that they had expected, there were a variety of reactions. Some groups just went back to what they had been doing before the movement and resumed business as usual. Some people gave up on God entirely. But from one of the groups that came out of the initial era, soon another arose.

This group in 1863 formally became the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Among its most prominent early individuals were James White, Joseph Bates, Hiram Edson, Ellen White, and others. The biblical foundations of the church were etched-out by this core group. Because one of the features of Adventism is the contemporary prophetic gift expressed through Ellen G. White, it has been suggested maliciously that she founded the church. But she was a mere 17 year old youth when in December 1844 she experienced her first vision. She was never a church president, or took formal position o denominational leadership. Certainly, those even casually acquainted with the history of the movement know that Ellen G. White did not found it, but was one of several significant founding individuals.

Another criteria that we mentioned was the undue elevation of man or the lowering of God. Adventist belief has never been suggested to wrongly elevate man, to turn him into a God. And as far as lowering God goes, again, no such charges have ever been seriously leveled. Seventh-day Adventism has not been seriously questioned on this point.

The third criterion we mentioned is the adding of sources of authority considered equal to or greater than the Bible. Returning to Ellen G. White, the contemporary prophet, this question is legitimate and will now be addressed. A prolific writer, her fertile pen produced numerous pages through the years of her long life. Her writings are considered by Seventh-day Adventists to be divinely inspired.

The Bible appears clearly to teach that the various gifts God has given to His church for its up-building would remain in it until the second coming of Christ. In some places, the Bible likens these gifts to the parts of the body, without which it is more or less crippled. In any case, given the conclusion that contemporary prophecy is foretold and supported by the Bible, one must consider the question of inspiration: are some prophets more inspired than others? Was Amos less inspired than Paul, or was Moses more inspired than Isaiah? What about Philip's daughters who prophesied, mentioned in the book of Acts? Since no Bible book records their prophetic utterances, is their prophecy less inspired than was John's? Obviously we cannot distinguish between degrees of inspiration. Either a prophet is true, or false; either inspired or uninspired. There can be no middle ground.

Ellen White's role, if anything, was least prominent in terms of setting up the Biblical foundations of the movement. She experienced and shared with the group the visions which she believed came to her from God. Unlike Mormonism or other religious groups that arose, the whole basis for Adventist belief was built upon Bible foundations. Whereas some other groups must go outside of the Bible and to added "inspired" writings to support their teachings, the foundation of the Seventh-day Adventist movement was, from its very beginnings, the Bible.

Mrs. White consistently pointed to the Bible as the acid test for the Christian's beliefs. The majority of her work, as that of most Bible prophets, was exhortation, guidance, and encouragement; only a small percentage of her writings contain directly predictive content. The many supposed prophets of other religious groups, with their own writings interpreting or superseding the Bible for their followers, make it tempting superficially to class Ellen G. White in the same category. But this would be a mistake. Her writings should be as carefully evaluated. if for no other reason than that she is the most prolific woman writer of all time, her work demands respect.

After an extensive study of both, the Bible and her writings, I have not discovered any point where she contradicts it, or where her writings must be used to supersede it. Seventh-day Adventist teachings to this day, are biblically-based and biblically-supported. Adventists have not added to the Bible. Ellen White's writings are considered to be inspired, but not to be Scripture. They have not been added to the Bible; nor will they be. To better understand this point, a significant look at the phenomenon of prophecy as recorded in the Bible will bring clarification. And we believe that a fair-minded look at the Ellen G. White writings themselves will support that evidence shows that the ultimate authority for Adventism is, as it always has been, the Bible, and that the writings of Ellen G. White have not been placed on a level authoritatively with the Bible.

Finally, let us consider the question of whether Adventism teaches salvation by works. Critics of Adventism have noted our emphasis upon the law of God. Because we have emphasized the Ten Commandments, and the Sabbath Commandment in particular, some have viewed this as evidence that we teach a form of salvation by works. But is a superficial glance enough to bring such a determination? To uphold the law does not necessarily point to the idea of salvation through works. In the Bible the law is presented in a positive light, from end to end. Positive references to the law abound in the New Testament. The law is a crucial instrument that the Holy Spirit uses in convicting us of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment. It forms the basis for evaluating man. It forms the basis for condemning all men who have not become connected with Christ. Clearly, without the law, God would have no basis for condemning Satan, sin, and evil, or saving the repentant sinner who trusts in Christ.


In conclusion, our brief survey suggests that Seventh-day Adventism be carefully evaluated before firmly affixing any charge of cultism. Recall the four criterion mentioned above. It was not founded by one or even two highly charismatic individuals, but by several earnest students of Scripture. Charges have never really been leveled against Adventism on the second point. The third point is more involved than might be imagined, but the strong emphasis upon the Bible and its use by the group as final doctrinal authority reveals that here, Adventists are on orthodox, if uncommon ground. Finally, a careful look beyond knee-jerk suspicions and pre-judgments about how salvation is taught, reveals that Seventh-day Adventists do not easily fit the cult label at that measure either.

Having suggested that Seventh-day Adventism is clear at all four key points, I must say that I care little whether we really are clear of the "cult" label or not. Sticks and stones do not change truth. Those who throw sticks and stones will throw their sticks and stones. Its not the throwing of sticks that matters, but whether charges stick. What matters is what the evidence shows, not what the prejudiced purport to show. What matters is simply what the Bible itself teaches when we accept it as our ultimate spiritual authority and interpret it according to its own innate presuppositions.

Often those who come to make these evaluations are obeying God's will as delineated in the Bible but selectively anyway, calling into question their own spiritual validity. They need to check their own gospel before they come and declare the gospel of Adventism faulty. Why don't we turn to the Bible together, and go on from there? Is Seventh-day Adventism a cult? No. But what of it? Neither having the label or not having it really matters in the end, but faith working through love. It is what the faith objectively produces that finally determines its verity. Only the faith that comes from God will lead to God. Let each serious seeker for truth seek-out that very faith, and make it his own through the One who died on the cross to give him life.




facebook  twitter  email